1952 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR
To start off, 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 4,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 400 kg more than 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 6C | CLK GTR |
Year Released | 1952 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 4998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2680 mm |