1952 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2003 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. (104 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 220 kg more than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1952 Alfa Romeo 6C 2003 Cadillac CTS
Make Alfa Romeo Cadillac
Model 6C CTS
Year Released 1952 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2443 cc 2597 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 104 HP 179 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 6000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 72 mm 83.3 mm
Engine Stroke Size 100 mm 79.6 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1400 kg 1620 kg
Vehicle Length 4690 mm 4840 mm
Vehicle Width 1910 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1510 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2890 mm