1952 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2003 Porsche Boxster
To start off, 2003 Porsche Boxster is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Porsche Boxster is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Porsche Boxster (262 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. (104 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Porsche Boxster should accelerate faster than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 20 kg more than 2003 Porsche Boxster.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2003 Porsche Boxster | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Porsche |
Model | 6C | Boxster |
Year Released | 1952 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 3179 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 262 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 78 mm |
Top Speed | 165 km/hour | 266 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2420 mm |