1952 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2004 Fiat Panda
To start off, 2004 Fiat Panda is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C (104 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2004 Fiat Panda. (70 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 2004 Fiat Panda.
Because 2004 Fiat Panda is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Fiat Panda will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2004 Fiat Panda | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Fiat |
| Model | 6C | Panda |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1251 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 69.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 82 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2310 mm |
