1952 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2004 Ford Explorer
To start off, 2004 Ford Explorer is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Explorer (239 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. (104 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Explorer should accelerate faster than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 102 kg more than 2004 Ford Explorer.
Because 2004 Ford Explorer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Explorer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2004 Ford Explorer | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | 6C | Explorer |
Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 239 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 90 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1298 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2900 mm |