1952 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2005 GMC Yukon
To start off, 2005 GMC Yukon is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 GMC Yukon (336 HP) has 232 more horse power than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Yukon weights approximately 1213 kg more than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 GMC Yukon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 GMC Yukon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2005 GMC Yukon | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | GMC |
| Model | 6C | Yukon |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 5965 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 336 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 102 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 92 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 2613 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1930 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3310 mm |
