1952 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2005 Smart Roadster
To start off, 2005 Smart Roadster is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C (104 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2005 Smart Roadster. (100 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 2005 Smart Roadster.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2005 Smart Roadster | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Smart |
Model | 6C | Roadster |
Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 66.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 67 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 165 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2370 mm |