1952 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2005 Toyota RAV4
To start off, 2005 Toyota RAV4 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota RAV4 (161 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. (104 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota RAV4 should accelerate faster than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 86 kg more than 2005 Toyota RAV4.
Because 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota RAV4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2005 Toyota RAV4 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Toyota |
Model | 6C | RAV4 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 89.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 97 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1314 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2470 mm |