1952 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2005 Toyota Tazz
To start off, 2005 Toyota Tazz is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C (104 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2005 Toyota Tazz. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota Tazz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 452 kg more than 2005 Toyota Tazz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Tazz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2005 Toyota Tazz | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Toyota |
Model | 6C | Tazz |
Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1296 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 77.4 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 948 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2430 mm |