1952 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2006 Audi A3
To start off, 2006 Audi A3 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi A3 (197 HP) has 93 more horse power than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C weights approximately 125 kg more than 2006 Audi A3.
Because 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2006 Audi A3 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Audi |
Model | 6C | A3 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1947 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 197 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 82.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 92.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 165 km/hour | 234 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1275 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2580 mm |