1952 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2008 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2008 SsangYong Musso is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,874 cc (5 cylinders), 2008 SsangYong Musso is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 SsangYong Musso weights approximately 476 kg more than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 2008 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2008 SsangYong Musso | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | SsangYong |
| Model | 6C | Musso |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2874 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 92.4 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Top Speed | 165 km/hour | 156 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1876 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2760 mm |
