1952 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2009 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser (154 HP) has 50 more horse power than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 2009 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2009 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Citroen |
| Model | 6C | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2179 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 154 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 96 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
