1952 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2009 Volkswagen Polo

To start off, 2009 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C (104 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2009 Volkswagen Polo. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C should accelerate faster than 2009 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 907 kg more than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C.

Because 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1952 Alfa Romeo 6C 2009 Volkswagen Polo
Make Alfa Romeo Volkswagen
Model 6C Polo
Year Released 1952 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2443 cc 1598 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 104 HP 100 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 5500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 72 mm 87.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 100 mm 76.5 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1400 kg 2307 kg
Vehicle Length 4690 mm 4200 mm
Vehicle Width 1910 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1510 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2470 mm