1952 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2012 Audi A3
To start off, 2012 Audi A3 is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A3 (123 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. (104 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2012 Audi A3 | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Audi |
| Model | 6C | A3 |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2443 cc | 1400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 123 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
