1952 Alfa Romeo 6C vs. 2012 Volvo XC70
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC70 is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,443 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo XC70 weights approximately 480 kg more than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C.
Because 2012 Volvo XC70 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC70 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Volvo XC70 has automatic transmission and 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C has manual transmission. 1952 Alfa Romeo 6C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Volvo XC70 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo 6C | 2012 Volvo XC70 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Volvo |
Model | 6C | XC70 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4838 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1862 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1604 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2815 mm |