1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 vs. 1947 Austin 16
To start off, 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Austin 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Austin 16 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1947 Austin 16 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 63 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1947 Austin 16 weights approximately 30 kg more than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51.
Because 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1947 Austin 16. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 | 1947 Austin 16 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Austin |
Model | AR 51 | 16 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1947 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1884 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 63 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 79.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 111.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 6.8:1 |
Top Speed | 105 km/hour | 121 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 63 L |