1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 vs. 1948 Austin A 70
To start off, 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 1948 Austin A 70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 63 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Austin A 70 weights approximately 20 kg more than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51.
Because 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1948 Austin A 70. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 | 1948 Austin A 70 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Austin |
Model | AR 51 | A 70 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1948 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1884 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 63 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 79.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 111.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 6.8:1 |
Top Speed | 105 km/hour | 134 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1270 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 63 L |