1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 vs. 1951 Holden FX
To start off, 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Holden FX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 (63 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1951 Holden FX. (51 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 should accelerate faster than 1951 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 weights approximately 280 kg more than 1951 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Holden FX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 | 1951 Holden FX | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Holden |
| Model | AR 51 | FX |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1884 cc | 2166 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2620 mm |
