1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 vs. 1952 Austin A 40
To start off, both 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 and 1952 Austin A 40 were released in the same year (1952). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 1,884 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 (63 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (49 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 weights approximately 260 kg more than 1952 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 | 1952 Austin A 40 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Austin |
Model | AR 51 | A 40 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1884 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 65.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 89 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 990 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2360 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 34 L |