1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 vs. 1961 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1961 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 would be higher. At 6,638 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Ford Thunderbird (339 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 276 more horse power than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. (63 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1961 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 625 kg more than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 | 1961 Ford Thunderbird | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
| Model | AR 51 | Thunderbird |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1884 cc | 6638 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 339 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1875 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 50 L |
