1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 vs. 1975 Toyota Corona
To start off, 1975 Toyota Corona is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 would be higher. At 1,884 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Toyota Corona (84 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. (63 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1975 Toyota Corona should accelerate faster than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 weights approximately 250 kg more than 1975 Toyota Corona.
Because 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Toyota Corona. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 | 1975 Toyota Corona | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Toyota |
Model | AR 51 | Corona |
Year Released | 1952 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1884 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 84 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2510 mm |