1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 vs. 1976 Volvo 265
To start off, 1976 Volvo 265 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Volvo 265 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Volvo 265 (148 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. (63 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Volvo 265 should accelerate faster than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Volvo 265 weights approximately 150 kg more than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Volvo 265. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 | 1976 Volvo 265 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Volvo |
Model | AR 51 | 265 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1884 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 73 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2660 mm |