1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 vs. 1977 Volvo 66
To start off, 1977 Volvo 66 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 would be higher. At 1,884 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 (63 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1977 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 should accelerate faster than 1977 Volvo 66.
Because 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 Volvo 66. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 | 1977 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Volvo |
Model | AR 51 | 66 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1884 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 73.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1550 mm |