1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 vs. 1978 Chevrolet El Camino
To start off, 1978 Chevrolet El Camino is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 would be higher. In terms of performance, 1978 Chevrolet El Camino (350 HP) has 287 more horse power than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. (63 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Chevrolet El Camino should accelerate faster than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51.
Because 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Chevrolet El Camino. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1978 Chevrolet El Camino has automatic transmission and 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 has manual transmission. 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1978 Chevrolet El Camino will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 | 1978 Chevrolet El Camino | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | AR 51 | El Camino |
Year Released | 1952 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 350 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2980 mm |