1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 vs. 1986 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 1986 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 would be higher. At 1,884 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 (63 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 should accelerate faster than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 weights approximately 410 kg more than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Fiat Ritmo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 | 1986 Fiat Ritmo | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Fiat |
| Model | AR 51 | Ritmo |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1884 cc | 1116 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 70.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 840 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4020 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2460 mm |
