1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 vs. 1986 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1986 Ford Ranger is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. (63 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 | 1986 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | AR 51 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1952 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1884 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1770 mm |