1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 vs. 1990 Chevrolet Astro
To start off, 1990 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Chevrolet Astro (183 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. (63 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 645 kg more than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 | 1990 Chevrolet Astro | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | AR 51 | Astro |
Year Released | 1952 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1884 cc | 4293 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 183 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 88.4 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1895 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2830 mm |