1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 vs. 1994 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1994 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 would be higher. At 1,884 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Nissan Pulsar (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. (63 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 weights approximately 150 kg more than 1994 Nissan Pulsar.
Because 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1994 Nissan Pulsar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 | 1994 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Nissan |
Model | AR 51 | Pulsar |
Year Released | 1952 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1884 cc | 1594 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2440 mm |