1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 vs. 1995 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 1995 Fiat Bravo is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 would be higher. At 1,895 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Fiat Bravo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Fiat Bravo (75 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. (63 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 weights approximately 105 kg more than 1995 Fiat Bravo.
Because 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Fiat Bravo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 | 1995 Fiat Bravo | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Fiat |
Model | AR 51 | Bravo |
Year Released | 1952 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1884 cc | 1895 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 90.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 21.0:1 |
Top Speed | 105 km/hour | 165 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1145 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 60 L |