1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 vs. 1996 Skoda Felicia
To start off, 1996 Skoda Felicia is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 would be higher. At 1,896 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Skoda Felicia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 63 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 weights approximately 190 kg more than 1996 Skoda Felicia.
Because 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Skoda Felicia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 | 1996 Skoda Felicia | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Skoda |
| Model | AR 51 | Felicia |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1884 cc | 1896 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 63 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1060 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2460 mm |
