1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 vs. 2000 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2000 Dodge Dakota is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 would be higher. At 2,458 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Dodge Dakota (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. (63 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 280 kg more than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 | 2000 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Dodge |
Model | AR 51 | Dakota |
Year Released | 1952 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1884 cc | 2458 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2850 mm |