1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 vs. 2002 Bristol Blenheim
To start off, 2002 Bristol Blenheim is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 would be higher. At 5,900 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Bristol Blenheim is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Bristol Blenheim weights approximately 145 kg more than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51.
Because 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Bristol Blenheim. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Bristol Blenheim has automatic transmission and 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 has manual transmission. 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Bristol Blenheim will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 | 2002 Bristol Blenheim | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Bristol |
| Model | AR 51 | Blenheim |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1884 cc | 5900 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1395 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2900 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 105 L |
