1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 vs. 2002 Citroen C3
To start off, 2002 Citroen C3 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 would be higher. At 1,884 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Citroen C3 (74 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. (63 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Citroen C3 should accelerate faster than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 weights approximately 170 kg more than 2002 Citroen C3.
Because 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Citroen C3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 | 2002 Citroen C3 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Citroen |
Model | AR 51 | C3 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1884 cc | 1398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 47 L |