1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 vs. 2004 Fiat Panda
To start off, 2004 Fiat Panda is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 would be higher. At 1,884 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Fiat Panda (70 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. (63 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Fiat Panda should accelerate faster than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 | 2004 Fiat Panda | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Fiat |
Model | AR 51 | Panda |
Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1884 cc | 1251 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 69.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 82 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 3600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 63 L |