1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 vs. 2004 Tata Safari
To start off, 2004 Tata Safari is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 would be higher. At 1,948 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Tata Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Tata Safari (135 HP @ 5530 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. (63 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Tata Safari should accelerate faster than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Tata Safari weights approximately 790 kg more than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 | 2004 Tata Safari | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Tata |
Model | AR 51 | Safari |
Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1884 cc | 1948 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 135 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5530 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 2040 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2660 mm |