1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 vs. 2004 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2004 Volvo XC90 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo XC90 (208 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. (63 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 788 kg more than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 | 2004 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Volvo |
Model | AR 51 | XC90 |
Year Released | 1952 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1884 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 2038 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 72 L |