1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 vs. 2005 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 would be higher. At 1,983 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 63 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 weights approximately 57 kg more than 2005 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Volkswagen Polo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 | 2005 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Volkswagen |
Model | AR 51 | Polo |
Year Released | 1952 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1884 cc | 1983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 63 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 95.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 19.5:1 |
Top Speed | 105 km/hour | 160 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1193 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 45 L |