1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 vs. 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (291 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 228 more horse power than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. (63 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 500 kg more than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 | 2006 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | AR 51 | TrailBlazer |
Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1884 cc | 4163 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 291 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 3280 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 95 L |