1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 vs. 2006 Fiat Palio II
To start off, 2006 Fiat Palio II is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 would be higher. At 1,884 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Fiat Palio II (72 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. (63 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Palio II should accelerate faster than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51.
Because 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Fiat Palio II. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 | 2006 Fiat Palio II | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Fiat |
Model | AR 51 | Palio II |
Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1884 cc | 1242 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 70.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 78.8 mm |
Top Speed | 105 km/hour | 164 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 3830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 54 L |