1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 vs. 2006 Mazda Drifter
To start off, 2006 Mazda Drifter is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 would be higher. At 2,606 cc, 2006 Mazda Drifter is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda Drifter (123 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. (63 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda Drifter should accelerate faster than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51.
Because 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Mazda Drifter. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 | 2006 Mazda Drifter | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
| Model | AR 51 | Drifter |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1884 cc | 2606 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 8.4:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 82 L |
