1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 vs. 2008 Chevrolet Lumina
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Lumina is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 would be higher. At 5,667 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Lumina is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet Lumina weights approximately 404 kg more than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51.
Because 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Chevrolet Lumina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Chevrolet Lumina has automatic transmission and 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 has manual transmission. 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Chevrolet Lumina will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 | 2008 Chevrolet Lumina | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Chevrolet |
Model | AR 51 | Lumina |
Year Released | 1952 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1884 cc | 5667 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 92 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1654 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2940 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 75 L |