1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 vs. 2009 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2009 Ford Mustang is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Mustang (300 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 237 more horse power than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. (63 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 weights approximately 284 kg more than 2009 Ford Mustang.
Because 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 | 2009 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
| Model | AR 51 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1884 cc | 4604 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2730 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 61 L |
