1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 vs. 2010 Scion tC
To start off, 2010 Scion tC is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Scion tC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Scion tC (161 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. (63 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Scion tC should accelerate faster than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51.
Because 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Scion tC. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 | 2010 Scion tC | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Scion |
| Model | AR 51 | tC |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1884 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 161 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1755 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1415 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 55 L |
