1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 vs. 2011 Holden Epica
To start off, 2011 Holden Epica is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 90 more horse power than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. (63 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51.
Because 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 has manual transmission. 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 | 2011 Holden Epica | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Holden |
Model | AR 51 | Epica |
Year Released | 1952 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1884 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 153 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2700 mm |