1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 vs. 2011 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2011 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 would be higher. At 1,884 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Volkswagen Polo (84 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. (63 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 weights approximately 180 kg more than 2011 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Volkswagen Polo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 | 2011 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Volkswagen |
| Model | AR 51 | Polo |
| Year Released | 1952 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1884 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 84 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Top Speed | 105 km/hour | 177 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1070 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1682 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1462 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2470 mm |
