1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 vs. 2012 Acura TL
To start off, 2012 Acura TL is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Acura TL (305 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 242 more horse power than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. (63 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Acura TL weights approximately 515 kg more than 1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo AR 51 | 2012 Acura TL | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Acura |
Model | AR 51 | TL |
Year Released | 1952 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1884 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1765 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3530 mm | 4928 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1453 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2776 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 77 L | 70 L |