1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante vs. 1949 Saab 92
To start off, 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Saab 92 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante (156 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1949 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante should accelerate faster than 1949 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Saab 92 weights approximately 70 kg more than 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante.
Because 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1949 Saab 92, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante | 1949 Saab 92 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Saab |
Model | Disco Volante | 92 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1949 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 762 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 156 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 735 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2480 mm |