1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante vs. 1960 Holden FC
To start off, 1960 Holden FC is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante would be higher. At 2,165 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Holden FC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante (158 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1960 Holden FC. (62 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante should accelerate faster than 1960 Holden FC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Holden FC weights approximately 245 kg more than 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante | 1960 Holden FC | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Holden |
Model | Disco Volante | FC |
Year Released | 1952 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2165 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 735 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2670 mm |