1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante vs. 1963 Austin A 99
To start off, 1963 Austin A 99 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante (156 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1963 Austin A 99. (107 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante should accelerate faster than 1963 Austin A 99. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Austin A 99 weights approximately 795 kg more than 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante | 1963 Austin A 99 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Austin |
Model | Disco Volante | A 99 |
Year Released | 1952 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2912 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 156 HP | 107 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 735 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2800 mm |