1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante vs. 1963 DKW Munga
To start off, 1963 DKW Munga is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante (158 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 DKW Munga weights approximately 375 kg more than 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1952 Alfa Romeo Disco Volante | 1963 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | DKW |
| Model | Disco Volante | Munga |
| Year Released | 1952 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 76.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 74 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.7:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 735 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2010 mm |
